Enterprise Content Management and Meaningful Use

As of last week, OnBase officially earned meaningful use certification as an “EHR Module” from the Drummond Group in both acute and ambulatory settings. I have mixed feelings about the meaningful use initiative and its ultimate impact on the quality of patient care. That said, I think that our certification says a lot about the state of ECM in healthcare and what it means to your organization.

The reality for many of you is that you probably have already deployed (or plan to deploy) a certified EHR (or EMR, but don’t get me started on the frequently disregarded distinction). On top of this, you’re more than likely using it in a manner that meets the stage one criteria. Do you really need to worry about yet another HIT application?

Technically, no, you probably don’t. But maybe that’s not the point.

Looking back on the process to establish meaningful use criteria, confusion reigned. As requirements and timelines were proposed, modified, rejected, reworked, debated, clarified, obscured and finally published, technology vendors and healthcare providers alike worried about the final outcome and its ultimate impact. What applications needed to be certified? What are the penalties? Do we have the budget? Among our current HIT application environment, what needs to be upgraded? Replaced? What if our physicians openly rebel? Ah, memories…

Here’s what our certification gets you: you have the assurance that OnBase can only enhance any of your plans with respect to meaningful use. If you’re currently compliant, implementing an OnBase ECM solution won’t change that. Not one tiny bit. That counts for something.

Also, when a vendor earns meaningful use certification, you have fairly concrete evidence of that vendor’s commitment to healthcare. Otherwise, why go to the trouble? For companies exclusively dedicated to healthcare, pursuing meaningful certification is a no-brainer. But it’s easy to see why companies that offer technology used in various markets might skip it altogether.

Finally, you have validation that ECM is a legitimate part of the HIT landscape. No, I’m not delusional. I fully realize that the EMR trumps every other application in scope, expense and impact. ECM, however, deserves a place at its side. Taking content normally outside your EMR and making it accessible within it – that’s a core value of ECM. Ultimately, that helps your EMR, your HIT crown jewel, become more complete, more effective and more useful.

And on a technical and financial level, that’s where true meaning lies.

Jared Blankenship

Jared Blankenship likes words. He likes to read them. He likes to write them. And he likes to share them. That pretty much explains his decade spent in business and technology journalism. Rich in complexity and perspectives, the healthcare industry eventually replaced journalism. Jared has spent almost six years in the healthcare IT, humbled daily by the new things he learns and grateful to those willing to share their knowledge. He counts his time spent volunteering in a local ICU and onsite participation in two major Cerner EMR deployments as his most valued. And he looks forward to adding more.

1 Response

  1. 02/18/2012

    […] The content then passes into subsequent phases of management, storage, preservation, and delivery.561 Along with Content Storage, Preservation, and Delivery, Capture is one of the key components of …ivery, Capture is one of the key components of Enterprise Content Management. This article will […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like...